Another week brings another edition of “The Instigator Podcast” featuring Chris Ostrander of Two In the Box and devout lover of soccer, myself.
This week we discuss the Mike Harrington being the latest to make a smartass comment about blogs, the mainstream media, us venomous bloggers and some Plus/Minus.
Almost three months ago, we discussed the potential of much-maligned pending-UFA center Tim Connolly returning to the Sabres, in a post we called Case #19: The Sabres might want to resign Tim Connolly.
That post got a lot of interesting feedback, some reluctant agreement, as well as a lot of disagreement. In the time since, Tim cooled off near the end of the year, failed to put up big numbers in the playoffs, and got hurt in Game 6 against Philadelphia, seemingly the death blow suffered by the Sabres. After Connolly took a cheap shot from then-Flyer Mike Richards, Buffalo never recovered and lost in seven games.
Incredibly, even seeing how the team suffered without him, fans were ready to move on without the team’s longest tenured player. The consensus is that he’s not wanted by the fans, whether he wants to be here or not.
When asked by 3rd Man In about the situation, Sabres president Ted Black was gracious enough to offer this:
“Darcy and the hockey department make decisions based on if/how that player can help us win the Stanley Cup. Our ultimate goal is to be as successful as we can be. Keep in mind we want players to be good teammates and good citizens off the ice as well. We’re aware that some players are more popular than others with our fans but the bottom line is we want to win the Cup. If the hockey department feels a certain player can help us accomplish that goal, then we will pursue (or retain, as applicable) that player.”
Basically, they’re going to do what they feel is best, whether the fans are going to love it or not.
In the case of Connolly, it’s a good bet fans won’t take too kindly to his return, despite the constant positive press he has received from The Buffalo News in his tenure as a Sabre.
Oh, I’m sorry, I meant negative. Read the rest of this entry
Take off your gas mask and hip waders.
It’d be real easy to make jokes and take shots at John Vogl for his Sabres Edge post yesterday. I’m not going to do that. I’ve been a supporter of John Vogl’s work for the Buffalo News on the Sabres beat. I’ve met him, I don’t have a negative opinion of him, and this modern-day “I remember when you could get a Hershey bar for a nickel!” rant isn’t gonna do much to change that.
But it does throw another can of gasoline on the dumpster fire that is traditional media vs. new media. In response to rumors that Sabres center Tim Connolly’s black eye was courtesy of Derek Roy’s fist, Vogl seemed to throw Twitter, and most of his audience, under the bus.
After putting on hip waders, rubber gloves, a gas mask and taking an anti-vomit pill, I ventured to the God-forsaken site and discovered what I expected to discover: One person posted the rumor, and a lot of other people copied and/or linked to the one comment, making it look like more than one person actually had an original thought.
If they had a thought, it should have been to go outside and enjoy the world rather than sit and stare at a computer screen.
As a fellow tweeter succinctly put it, it’s the message, not the medium.
Blaming Twitter for this is misguided. Sure, there’s a sense of being unaccountable for what you say when you don’t require and credentials to say it, but media is heading in that direction. Anyone can be heard. The office water cooler is now on the internet, and there’s no going back.
Adapting to it and accepting the pitfalls is required in today’s age, whether professional journalists such as Vogl likes it or not. It seems like it was a member of the media, former Sabre Matthew Barnaby, who ignited this whole thing with this tweet:
I can’t confirm 100 percent but it looks like roy popped connoly once at the catwalk but not a fight
That’s a member of the media, an employee of ESPN, the worldwide leader, helping spread a rumor. And John Vogl blames this on the people without a credential hanging around their neck? Again, misguided.
As far as Tim Connolly’s black eye, it doesn’t seem to be much of a story, with Derek Roy denying being involved and Lindy Ruff somewhat explaining what happened.
“I didn’t do anything to him,” Roy said. “Trust me. I would not hit a teammate at a charity event, that’s for sure. I’m the last guy in this dressing room, if you ask anybody, who would do anything like that.
“I heard it about it this morning. I’m just upset about it because I didn’t do anything. I don’t know who would smear my name like that. I didn’t do anything.
“Nothing happened. It was obviously a rumor. I don’t know who would make that stuff up. If you want to know what happened, ask him.”
Of course, no word from Timmy yet, so who knows. Until we hear from him, there’s room to wonder.
I’m sure many bloggers may not have spent much effort talking about a black eye with those quotes if the writer didn’t attack a good portion of the readership when he relayed them.
Black eyes go away. When will traditional media’s distaste for new media do the same?